Site Map · Contact Us
News

More news

2010
05/03
Anti-Corruption Network meetings held in Paris, 29-31st March 2010.

2010
04/26
Counter Terrorist Financing interactive world map

2010
04/22
Annual Report 2009

2010
02/03
Duvalier assets can not (yet) be returned to Haiti - Swiss Federal Court Decision

2009
12/23
The Basel Institute on Governance held its international seminar on CTF (“Giessbach III”) on 15-17 December 2009

2009
12/17
News article (in German) from the Luzerner Zeitung

2009
12/11
General Facts about Switzerland's Financial Center

2009
12/09
International Anti-Corruption Day, 9 December 2009

2009
11/09
Get connected: The Asset Recovery Experts Network

2009
11/02
Working Paper No 7: The Political Economy of Asset Recovery Processes

2009
10/30
Tracing stolen assets - A practitioner's handbook

2009
10/30
Executive Agreement signed between INTERPOL and the Basel Institute on Governance

2009
10/16
Non-State Actors as Standard Setters

2009
09/04
TI Global Corruption Report 2009

2009
05/29
Erica Harper: International Law and Standards Applicable in Natural Disaster Situations

2009
05/19
Countering Terrorist Financing

2009
04/06
Interdisciplinary Conference on Conflict of Interest: Call for Papers

2009
04/01
Annual Report 2008 released

2009
03/25
Joint conference ETHZ/Nadel course and Basel Institute on Governance on: What do we know about the results of fighting corruption in developing countries and development cooperation?

2009
03/25
Basel Institute on Governance awarded StAR training program

2009
02/20
Anti-corruption Law & Enforcement Conference

2008
12/20
Working Paper No 5: Poverty and Corruption: About Poorer and Richer Ways of Life

2008
11/25
Giessbach II, 1-3 October 2008 (Davos, Switzerland): Combating the Financing of Terrorism

2008
08/25
Global Fraud Summit, 14-17 October 2008 (Singapore)

2008
05/25
Available now: Papers and presentations from the conference on "Philanthropy in Global Health - Governance and Effectiveness Criteria"

2008
05/25
New address and phone numbers

2008
05/25
Farewell letter from the Executive Director

2008
05/25
Available now: Papers and presentations from the conference on "Philanthropy in Global Health - Governance and Effectiveness Criteria"

2008
05/20
Mark Pieth (ed.), Recovering Stolen Assets

2008
03/25
Basel Institute on Governance signs Memorandum with UNICRI

2008
03/25
2nd Annual Euroepan Anti-corruption Summit

2008
01/23
UNCAC: A Bangladesh Compliance and Gap Analysis

2007
12/20
New Working Paper: National Integrity Systems from a Human Rights Perspective

2007
06/04
Compliance in the financial industry

2007
05/20
Working Paper No 4: An Evaluation of National Integrity Systems from a Human Rights Perspective

2007
02/23
Corruption - A Glossary of International Criminal Standards

2007
01/23
The international dimensions of judicial accountability

2007
01/20
Working Paper No 3: Verhaltensregeln für die Verwaltung von Vorsorgeeinrichtungen

2006
05/20
Working Paper No 2: Multistakeholder Initiatives to Combat Money Laundering and Bribery

2005
10/22
International aspects of corporate liability and corruption

2004
05/20
Mark Pieth and Gemma Aiolfi (ed.), A Comparative Guide to Anti-Money Laundering

2003
05/20
Working Paper No 1: Anti-Money Laundering: Levelling the Playing Field

2003
04/04
The private sector becomes active: The Wolfsberg process

Displaying results 100 to 142 out of 142

< Previous

1

2

2009/10/30

Working Paper No 6: Managing Proceeds of Asset Recovery

The Basel Institute on Governance is proud to announce the release of its 6th working paper: Managing Proceeds of Asset Recovery: The Case of Nigeria, Peru, the Philippines and Kazakhstan, written by Ignasio Jimu.

This paper looks at the use of proceeds of asset recovered from Sani Abacha, Vladimir Montesinos, and Ferdinand Marcos and their families. It will also briefly address a much more recent case involving Kazakhstan. Repatriation of stolen monies makes available additional resources for development activities. The challenge is to ensure efficient, accountable and transparent use of such assets, given states may lack capacity or political will and that corruption may be prevalent at various levels of government. Transparency allows for better utilisation of recovered assets, and better targeting of resources into sectors that have potential to benefit the victims of corruption, who happen to be mostly the poor. Lack of effective follow up mechanisms may lead to the inappropriate allocation of resources into sectors that have little effect on alleviating poverty. The cases under review here offer lessons on how to manage repatriation and utilisation of proceeds of asset recovery. Further lessons relate to the participation of third parties and the benefits of making the results of the entire process public.

Working Paper No 6