Working Paper · 1 Sep 2018
Working Paper 25: High Level Reporting Mechanisms: A comparative analysis
by Valeria Silva, Gemma Aiolfi · Published by Basel Institute on Governance
Collective ActionHLRM
This report discusses the different contexts and processes through which a High Level Reporting Mechanism (HLRM) has been designed and implemented in Colombia, Ukraine, Panama and Argentina, as well as initial interest in the HLRM model in Peru.
Its aim is to understand the specificities of each case and draw lessons applicable to future projects in other countries, whilst respecting the commitment to develop an HLRM that takes account of the specific country’s context.
About this Working Paper
This paper is part of the Basel Institute on Governance Working Paper Series, ISSN: 2624-9650.
How to cite
Silva, V., Aiolfi, G. (2018). ‘High Level Reporting Mechanisms: A comparative analysis’. Working Paper 25, Basel Institute on Governance
Related publications
Collective Action, Prevention Research and Innovation
Working Paper 60: Understanding the enemy: Insights from corrupt networks to improve anti-corruption Collective Action initiatives
Collective Action, Business Integrity Ethics and Compliance
Working Paper 56: Anti-corruption Collective Action: A typology for a new era
Collective Action, Private Sector
Working Paper 46: Incrementando el impacto de los Pactos de Integridad en la contratación pública: un análisis desde la experiencia en España
Collective Action, Business Integrity Ethics and Compliance
Anti-corruption Collective Action in the G20/B20 process: Charting progress 2020–2024
Collective Action, Business Integrity Ethics and Compliance
Collective Action in practice: a game-changer for business integrity
Collective Action, Private Sector, Business Integrity Ethics and Compliance
Putting business integrity on the global agenda: Report from the 5th International Collective Action Conference
Collective Action
Policy Brief 11: Lutte contre la corruption dans les États côtiers d’Afrique de l’Ouest : comment l’Action Collective peut aider
Collective Action, Corruption Prevention and Public Governance
Policy Brief 8: It takes a network to defeat a network – What Collective Action practitioners can learn from research into corrupt networks
Corruption Prevention and Public Governance
Policy Brief 9: Informal networks and what they mean for anti-corruption practice
Collective Action, Private Sector